Advocate

Years of Legal Mastery. One Mission : Justice.

Backed by decades of experience and legal insight, Advocate Amarsingh S Gautam handles complex Trials from serious criminal charges to high-stakes, Family Cases, Civil suits, Business Outstanding Recovery Cases, with unwavering dedication.

Advocacy That Stands Unchallenged

With a proven track record of success, Advocate Amarsingh S Gautam diligently safeguards the interests of clients facing below legal cases

Practicing @ Magistrate, Session/District Court, Tribunal Court, Gujarat High Court, Supreme Court of India. 

Our Client-Centric Approach

At Advocate Amarsingh Gautam’s firm, we prioritize building long-term trust with our clients. We achieve this through honest communication, ethical practice, and dependable legal support. You can rely on our consistent dedication and transparency at every stage of your legal journey.

Confidentiality Assured

Your case details remain strictly private. We uphold the highest standards of confidentiality, ensuring sensitive legal matters are handled with discretion, professionalism, and complete respect for your personal and legal privacy.

advocate amarsingh gautam ahmedabad

Advocate Amarsingh Gautam

About Advocate Amarsingh S Gautam

Advocate Amarsingh Gautam is a highly experienced legal practitioner with a distinguished record of many years in legal practice. He has built a sterling reputation founded on reliability, courtroom precision, and an unwavering commitment to client-first advocacy.

His practice specializes across the critical domains of Criminal Trials, Civil litigation, and Family disputes. Advocate Amarsingh Gautam’s approach uniquely blends profound legal expertise with an unyielding ethical responsibility.

With a proven track record, he has successfully resolved many Session Trial matters, including more than 25 complex POCSO cases. Advocate Amarsingh Gautam demonstrates exceptional proficiency in handling intricate legal challenges, including those involving IPC Sections 302 (murder), 307 (attempt to murder), 376 (rape), cases under the NDPS Act, POCSO Act, and financial fraud.

Whether it involves securing bail, adeptly navigating complex Criminal & Civil matters, or effectively resolving property conflicts, Advocate Amarsingh Gautam ensures that each client receives dedicated and focused representation. He regularly appears and practices before the Hon’ble Magistrate, District, and Sessions Courts, Tribunals as well as the Gujarat High Court. Furthermore, he provides strategic consultation for matters requiring escalation to the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.

At Advocate Amarsingh Gautam’s independent firm, precision, persistence, and professionalism define every aspect of his approach. He is deeply committed to securing justice through through legal strategy and unparalleled courtroom expertise. Clients consistently receive trustworthy legal support at every stage of their case.

Our Approach to Serious Criminal Defense

In cases of serious and heinous crimes, every detail matters. Advocate Amarsingh Gautam’s approach is characterized by:

  • Thorough Legal Strategy:

    A meticulous examination of evidence, comprehensive legal research, and the development of a strong defense strategy tailored to the unique circumstances of each case.

  • Courtroom Expertise:

    Proficient advocacy and strategic cross-examination before the Hon'ble Magistrate, District, Sessions Courts, and the Gujarat High Court.

  • Unyielding Commitment to Justice:

    A steadfast dedication to upholding the principles of natural justice and ensuring that every client receives a fair and impartial hearing.

  • Discreet and Professional Handling:

    All sensitive legal matters are managed with the utmost discretion and professionalism, respecting your personal and legal privacy.

We understand the gravity of these charges and the potential life-altering consequences. Advocate Amarsingh Gautam and his firm stand ready to provide diligent, ethical, and effective legal representation, guiding you with clarity and unwavering support through every step of the judicial process, even for matters requiring consultation for escalation to the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

RAPE

While India experiences a high volume of reported and unreported alleged sexual offenses, it has been observed that a considerable number of reported cases may arise from situations such as consensual relationships, extramarital entanglements, financial disputes, or fraudulent schemes, rather than actual non-consensual acts.

 

We leverage our profound legal knowledge to meticulously scrutinize the evidentiary framework established by law enforcement in such matters. Our dedicated efforts are aimed at uncovering the factual matrix in judicial proceedings to ensure that true justice is served.

POCSO (Protection of Child from Sexual Offences Act, 2012)

Experts generally recognize the POCSO Act (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012) as a significant step in India’s effort to protect children from sexual abuse, but also acknowledge ongoing challenges in its implementation and enforcement. While the Act has a positive impact on reducing the growth rate of sexual offenses against children, critics point out areas needing improvement, including infrastructure gaps, inadequate training for law enforcement, and delays in justice delivery.

A discernible trend indicates that adolescents aged 15 to 22, who enter into romantic relationships, may inadvertently fall under the ambit of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, resulting in substantial strain on the correctional system. This phenomenon highlights a critical challenge concerning young adults aged 18 to 25, who, despite their potential as future contributors to the nation, are becoming a liability due to insufficient legal literacy and a lack of awareness regarding relevant statutory provisions.

Our firm offers unparalleled legal expertise to our clients, striving for the highest success rates. We are committed to these endeavors with the broader interests of the nation and its younger generation in mind, aiming to safeguard victims, the accused, and national well-being.

Murder (IPC 302, 304a, 304b, 306, 307)

IPC Section 302 deals with the punishment for murder under the Indian Penal Code.

In short, whoever commits murder shall be punished with death, or imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to a fine.

IPC Section 304A deals with causing death by negligence under the Indian Penal Code.

In short, it applies when a person causes the death of another by a rash or negligent act that does not amount to culpable homicide (which is a more severe offense). The punishment for this can extend up to two years of imprisonment, or a fine, or both.

Common examples often include deaths resulting from:

  • Road accidents due to rash or negligent driving.
  • Medical negligence where a doctor’s carelessness leads to a patient’s death.
  • Industrial accidents caused by negligence in safety protocols.

 

IPC Section 304B deals with “Dowry Death” in the Indian Penal Code.

In short, it’s a specific type of death where:

  • A woman dies due to burns or bodily injury, or otherwise than under normal circumstances.
  • This death occurs within seven years of her marriage.
  • It’s proven that soon before her death, she was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband or his relatives for, or in connection with, any demand for dowry.

If these conditions are met, the husband or his relatives are deemed to have caused her death, and the punishment is a minimum of seven years imprisonment, which may extend to imprisonment for life. This section aims to combat the social evil of dowry-related violence and deaths.

IPC Section 306 deals with “Abetment of Suicide” under the Indian Penal Code.

In short, it states that if any person commits suicide, whoever abets (instigates, conspires with, or intentionally aids) the commission of such suicide, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to a fine.

The key elements for a conviction under Section 306 often require:

  • An act of suicide actually occurred.
  • The accused had the intention (mens rea) to instigate or aid the deceased to commit suicide.
  • There was a direct and proximate link between the accused’s actions and the suicide. Mere harassment or a general instigation might not be enough; an active role in pushing the person to the act is generally required.

 

IPC Section 307 deals with “Attempt to Murder” under the Indian Penal Code.

In short, it applies when a person does any act with the intention or knowledge that if it caused death, they would be guilty of murder (as defined in Section 300 IPC), but the death does not actually occur.

The punishment for this offense can extend up to ten years of imprisonment and a fine. If the act causes hurt to any person, the punishment can be more severe, potentially including imprisonment for life.

The key elements are the intention or knowledge to commit murder, even if the attempt is unsuccessful or only causes injury. The focus is on the accused’s mindset and the nature of the act, not necessarily the outcome.

Family Disputes

Refer to a broad range of disagreements and conflicts that arise between individuals within a familial relationship, typically requiring legal intervention for resolution.

In India, family disputes are governed by a complex interplay of personal laws (based on religion, e.g., Hindu, Muslim, Christian laws) and various secular statutes. These laws aim to regulate personal and domestic relationships, rights, and duties.

Common types of family disputes include:

  • Child-Related Matters
  • Marriage and Divorce
  • Financial and Property Disputes
  • Domestic Violence.
  • Other Related Issues: 
    • Dowry harassment (IPC Section 498A): Cruelty by husband or his relatives.
    • Disputes related to live-in relationships (which have some legal recognition under domestic violence laws).

The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (ACB)

The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PCA) is a significant Indian law designed to combat corruption, primarily involving public servants. It has undergone amendments, most notably in 2018, to strengthen its provisions and bring it in line with international anti-corruption standards.

  • Criminalizes various forms of corruption
  • Defines “Public Servant” broadly
  • Prescribes strict penalties
  • Covers both bribe-takers and bribe-givers

 

NDPS Act (Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985)

The NDPS Act (Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985) is India’s stringent law enacted to control and regulate operations related to narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances.

In short, it prohibits the production, manufacturing, cultivation, possession, sale, purchase, transport, storage, and consumption of any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance, unless for medical or scientific purposes. It categorizes offenses based on the quantity of the substance (small, intermediate, or commercial) and prescribes severe penalties, including lengthy imprisonment and heavy fines, with stricter provisions for commercial quantities and repeat offenses. The Act also includes provisions for the forfeiture of property derived from illicit drug trafficking and establishes the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) for enforcement.

CHEATING & FORGERY

Cheating (IPC Section 415 & others):

  • In short: Cheating occurs when someone deceives another person, and through that deception, fraudulently or dishonestly induces them to: 
    • Deliver any property.
    • Consent to allow someone to retain property.
    • Do or omit to do something they wouldn’t have done or omitted if not deceived, which causes or is likely to cause damage or harm.
  • Key elements: Deception and fraudulent/dishonest inducement leading to a transfer of property or a harmful act/omission.
  • Related Sections: IPC Section 420 is an aggravated form of cheating, specifically involving cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property, or the making, alteration, or destruction of a valuable security.

Forgery (IPC Section 463 & others):

  • In short: Forgery is the act of making a false document or false electronic record with the intent to cause damage or injury to the public or any person, or to support a false claim or title, or to cause someone to part with property, or to enter into a contract, or with intent to commit fraud.
  • Key elements: The creation of a “false document” (as defined in IPC Section 464) and a specific malicious intent.
  • Related Sections: 
    • IPC Section 464 defines what constitutes “making a false document.”
    • IPC Section 465 prescribes general punishment for forgery.
    • IPC Section 468 deals specifically with forgery for the purpose of cheating, highlighting the common link between the two offenses.

In essence, forgery is about creating a fake document or record, while cheating is about using deception (which might involve a forged document) to gain an unfair advantage or cause harm.

The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NIA Act)

The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NIA Act) is a key piece of legislation in India that governs the law relating to promissory notes, bills of exchange, and cheques.

In short, it provides the legal framework for these common financial instruments, ensuring their transferability and enforceability. The Act defines what constitutes these instruments, outlines the rights and liabilities of the parties involved, and crucially, includes provisions for dealing with their dishonour, especially cheque bounce cases (Section 138 of the NIA Act), which carry both civil and criminal implications.

The NIA Act aims to facilitate smooth financial transactions and maintain trust in commercial dealings by providing legal certainty and recourse for payment instruments.

Civil Suits include:

  • Contract Disputes: Breach of contract, specific performance of contracts.
  • Property Disputes: Ownership disputes, partition suits, eviction suits, injunctions related to property.
  • Money Recovery Suits: Recovery of debt, damages for loss.
  • Service Matters: Disputes related to employment contracts, professional negligence.
  • Declaration Suits: Seeking a legal declaration of a right or status.

NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal)

The NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal) is a quasi-judicial body in India that was constituted under the Companies Act, 2013, and became operational on June 1, 2016.

In short, the NCLT is India’s specialized forum for adjudicating disputes and matters related to companies and corporate insolvency. It consolidates the functions previously handled by various authorities (like the Company Law Board, BIFR, and certain powers of High Courts) into a single, dedicated tribunal.

Its primary functions include:

  • Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP): It is the adjudicating authority for corporate insolvency and bankruptcy proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC).
  • Company Law Matters: It handles a wide range of issues under the Companies Act, 2013, such as: 
    • Mergers, demergers, and amalgamations.
    • Prevention of oppression and mismanagement.
    • Winding up of companies.
    • Reduction of share capital.
    • Disputes related to company registration, share transfers, and deposits.
    • Investigation into company affairs and freezing of assets.

Legal Team Members

Advocate Arun Tomar

Advocate Arun Tomar

Advocate Jignesh Datt

Advocate Jignesh Datt

Advocate S R Rajput

Advocate S R Rajput

Ayushi Singh

Ayushi Singh

Vishwa Rathod

Vishwa Rathod

Riya Thakor

Riya Thakor

Tamanna Vaghela

Tamanna Vaghela

Let's Talk Law: Expert Guidance, When You Need It

Your legal queries deserve expert attention

Whether it’s a pressing legal matter demanding immediate action, or a strategic consultation for future planning, our firm is here to provide clarity and support. We invite you to reach out for a confidential discussion, a call or message is all it takes to connect with experienced legal counsel.